Google refutes claims it violated its own guidelines and misled advertisers | Engadget

has denied “extremely inaccurate claims” that it may have violated its own rules and misled advertisers over ad viewership on third-party websites. 

Through the Google Video Partners network and (an ad product that’s also used on ), the company handles placement of video ads on external websites and apps. According to , Google tells brands that their ads will be on “high-quality” sites, appear before the main content of a video and run with audio on. It also says that advertisers won’t pay if users skip the ads. However, a third-party analytics company suggested in a report that Google fails to live up to these standards around 80 percent of the time.

Adalytics said the ads often appear on lower-quality websites, such as those with misinformation or pirated content, and that they can be positioned in small video players on the side or bottom of the screen, away from the main “in-stream” content. Some of the ads run without any audio, while in other cases, there were was “little to no video content in between consecutive TrueView ads.” Adalytics says other ads autoplayed without the viewer engaging with them.

In some instances, the company notes, the skip button that typically appears after five seconds was obscured, forcing viewers to watch the whole ad. That’s “a direct violation of Google’s quality standards for TrueView ads,” Adalytics says, and it may have contributed to artificially inflated ad metrics, leading to advertisers paying more.

Adalytics reviewed ad campaigns for more than 1,100 brands between 2020 and this year. It says customers that might have bought “muted, auto-playing, mis-declared TrueView skippable in-stream inventory include” the US government, the European Parliament, Disney+, HP, Samsung, Sephora, TikTok, Microsoft and General Motors. As it happens, some other Google divisions (Google Career Certificates and Google Workspace Domains) are on the list.

Media buyers Adalytics shared the report with accused Google of conducting “ad fraud” and suggested brands weren’t getting what they paid for. Others have demanded a refund. The “misalignment” could have cost brands billions in advertising dollars, Adalytics said. One “major consumer goods brand” found that 20 percent of a $75,000-plus campaign budget was directed toward YouTube channels, with the remainder spent on ads that ran on third-party destinations such as investing.com and Candy Crush Saga.

Google has firmly rejected the report’s findings. The company’s global video solutions chief, Marvin Renaud, asserted that Adalytics “used unreliable sampling and proxy methodologies.” An “overwhelming majority of video ad campaigns” run on YouTube, Renaud claimed, with brands having the option to opt out at any time from running their ads on Google Video Partners-affiliated apps and websites.

Even so, over 90 percent of Google Video Partners “are visible to people across the web,” Renaud argued. “We use real-time ad quality signals to determine if people are present and paying attention that help us decide whether to serve a video ad in a Google Video Partner site or app.”

In addition, Renaud wrote, Google rigorously enforces policies that prohibit third-party sites from using deceptive or disruptive techniques to generate advertising revenue, such as placing ads in hidden browser windows. Renaud added that, last year, Google stopped running ads on more than 143,000 websites it deemed to violate its rules.

The Adalytics claims come as Alphabet faces close scrutiny over its advertising practices. The Department of Justice earlier this year in an attempt to break up its ad business. This month, the European Union that the only remedy it could see for Google to address its antitrust concerns would be to sell off part of the advertising empire.

All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission. All prices are correct at the time of publishing.