Crypto players seek re-look of proposed TDS provision
The industry also urged the government to reconsider the decision to levy a tax of 30% on current market value when crypto assets are gifted or given to employees as part of their remuneration, saying the tax is levied without waiting for the receiver to sell it and book any profit.
These issues figured when representatives of leading domestic crypto exchanges met with finance ministry officials on Friday to discuss budget proposals, people familiar with the deliberations told ET.
They submitted their representation on some of the key concerns.
Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman has proposed a 30% tax on gains made from any private virtual digital assets from April 1.The budget has also proposed a 1% TDS on payments towards virtual currencies beyond Rs 10,000 in a year and taxation of such gifts in the hands of the recipient.
Many experts said crypto taxation required more discussion before implementation as the current proposals lack clarity on various issues.
Discover the stories of your interest
“They are not banning crypto but killing it with tax compliance,” a crypto industry official told ET on condition of anonymity. “TDS is technically not feasible as tracking down identity becomes difficult.”
Responsibility of paying 1% TDS lies with the purchaser at the time of payment. This would be difficult to comply with in situations where assets are being bought from a non-resident seller and the domestic exchange only facilitates supply from an overseas exchange, the person said.
Homi Mistry, partner at Deloitte India, said, “In a case where the consideration is in kind, the provision says the payer is responsible to make sure that the TDS is duly deposited.” However, how this will be enforced is yet to be seen, he said.
There is also a lack of clarity on how it will apply in various other situations, like, for example, when there is an exchange of one kind of crypto asset with another (barter) without any cash, industry insiders said.
They have also sought clarity on transactions with residents of a country with which India has a double taxation avoidance agreement.
The industry also wants clarity on issues including in whose favour will TDS be deducted and who would be the counterparty as foreign exchanges will not reveal the identity of sellers, making compliance difficult.
Some experts termed the budget proposals a knee-jerk reaction.
“The introduction of crypto tax under the income tax regime is nothing less than a knee-jerk reaction to tax a fast-building parallel ecosystem currency,” said Saurrav Sood, practice leader, international tax, at professional services firm SW India.
He said the draft provisions of tax on crypto currency lacks certain basic clarity. For instance, he asked, while there is 30% tax on crypto transactions, where there is no transfer but mere exchange of cryptocurrency from one type into another (say, from Bitcoin to Etherium), will such exchange be subject to tax?
“All these things will need greater clarity before it is put into effect,” Sood said. “It would have been prudent to bring in a draft paper for taxation of virtual digital assets in public forums for consultations and comments before legislating it as a law.”
For all the latest Technology News Click Here
For the latest news and updates, follow us on Google News.