Top broadcasters join IBF in legal tussle with Trai, move Supreme Court against HC order

IBF had initially challenged the Bombay High Court’s order, wherein a division bench upheld Trai’s regulatory power in relation to amendments to the tariff order. Now, the broadcasters have also filed petitions in the apex court against the June 30 order of the Bombay High Court.

ET was first to report on July 14th that other broadcasters were expected to move the apex court, following IBF.

TV industry sources said that the broadcasters have asked the nation’s top court to set aside the Bombay High Court order, as it “impinges” on the broadcasters’ fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

The petitions maintain that the high court incorrectly applied an additional requirement of “public interest” with regard to Article 19(2), which authorises the government to impose reasonable restrictions upon the freedom of speech and expression under eight specific grounds – including, sovereignty and integrity of India, defamation, incitement to an offence-and doesn’t include public interest.

“The most striking aspect of the Bombay High Court judgement is that it permits regulation of free speech and expression under the ‘subjective’ and ‘constitutionally impermissible’ ground of ‘public interest’,” said a legal head of a top broadcasting company.